| Structure | Definition | Advantages/Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Divide the literature into themes or categories | Distinct themes from the literature are discussed and analyzed | Popular approach because it allows for the integration of theoretical and research literature. Must be sure that themes are clearly related to the literature |
| Present the literature chronologically | Literature is divided into time periods | Useful when examining the development of a topic over time |
| Explore the theoretical and methodological literature | Discussion of theoretical literature followed by an exploration of methodological literature to demonstrate precedence for a particular research design | Useful when the literature on a topic is mostly theoretical with little or no research literature. Can be used to identify a need for more qualitative research |
| Examine the theoretical literature and research literature in two sections | A comprehensive discussion of both theoretical and research literature in two separate sections | May tend to be a description rather than a critical revew |
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2wLeCge.
For more information on these types of literature review structures, read:
NOTE: The citation format you use for your review will depend either on your instructor (if this is a class assignment) or on the journal to which you are submitting (if this is a research project).
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association by 
The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th Edition by 
